A family friend of mine made a cameo as a background extra/singer in the new pilot of “90210” which premiered last night on the CW Network, so I had no choice but to tune in! I already decided I wouldn’t allow myself to get wrapped up in yet another TV show in the fall season. I like Shenae Grimes (of Degrassi: The Next Generation), and as excited, as I was to see my friend, I did not enjoy watching the two-hour episode, only to see her on screen for less than 3 minutes.
I became turned off halfway through the show because there seems to be a trend in creating programs about over-privileged teenagers. (See: 90210,The Hills, Gossip Girl, and Privileged) It’s funny that three out of four of these programs listed are airing on the CW network. Shows like these center their plot points around gossip, drama, scandal, sex, partying, the “in crowd”, designer duds and doing unthinkable things to get you there.
It seemed only a few years ago that the emphasis for prime-time shows had plotlines centered around college life including Felicity, Dawson’s Creek, and Gilmore Girls. The new focus has transitioned to high school.
I went to a performing arts high school in Manhattan as a musical theater major, so I know my time in the classroom didn’t mimic my peers at a “typical” high school. My friends and I didn’t party – Instead we would hang out at Starbucks talking about auditions, bands we liked and of course, boys.
In high school, I remember watching the O.C. (executive produced by Josh Schwartz of Gossip Girl) and thinking to myself, that it’s 8 o’clock at night and yet they are able to show some teenager doing lines of coke at an out-of control party during primetime hours. I expect the new season of 90210 to follow suit by airing something that is equivalent during their first season.
Question: Why does the television culture present shows with characters who are underage are able to get into bars and also show them slipping small bottles of alcohol into their drinks in public at cafes?
I have enough wherewithal to know that underage drinking occurs in real life, but why is it be embraced and acceptable to watch? Maybe my cause for alarm is an early maternal instinct or simply that I don’t enjoy hearing about people younger than me heading down the path of corruption. I prefer to hear about children that haven’t lost their innocence, and enjoy jumping on a trampoline or laughing with their friends.
Alcohol:
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, “about 90% of the alcohol consumed by youth under the age of 21 years in the United States is in the form of binge drinks.” That’s an alarming statistic.
In future programming, I hope to see young people who are happy being sober and enjoy activities that don’t require getting drunk. Instead of that seeming “square” to society, it would be nice for those children to be embraced for their healthy choices.
“Let’s talk about sex, baby.”
We know kids are having sex at younger and younger ages and winding up pregnant (See: Juno, The Secret Life of the American Teenager). Jamie-Lynn Spears had a baby at age16. She was blamed for a pregnancy pact at a high school in MA where they have had more teen pregnancy cases this year than ever before. Bristol Palin, daughter of Republican VP candidate, Sarah Palin is 17 and pregnant. I read Jamie-Lynn is sending her over a gift for support and to welcome her into the club. Of course I can’t speak to the role modeling that either of these girls have had.
There also are more twenty-year-old celebrities having babies too. They seem to be everywhere these days! It’s a little less shocking to me having children in your twenties because at age 18, you are legally an adult and old enough to accept responsibility for your actions.
According to James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth in an article in the Detroit Free Press he says today “The U.S. has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the developed world, because we refuse to get real when it comes to young people and sex. In a nation where 95% of citizens have sex before marriage, our official government policy on sex education is “abstinence-only-until-marriage”. The Bush administration has pumped over $1.5 billion into these programs over the last eight years, despite an exhaustive congressional evaluation showing that they have “no impact on teen behavior.”
ATTN: Bush Administration: IT’S NOT WORKING!
Kids are going to have sex anyway, especially if you tell them abstinence is the only option. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy says “that over 34% of all teens have had sex by grade 9.” Sure it’s the beginning of high school but these students are only 14 and 15. Their bodies haven’t even stopped developing from puberty yet.
My high school had comprehensive sex education, which meant the school received no funding from the government. Conservatives believe that comprehensive sex education encourages promiscuity and sexual relations. If you have a course that is “abstinence only” and the students decide to have sex, they haven’t been informed about condoms and other forms of contraceptives to protect themselves and many end up using incorrect measures as a fail-safe.
You can compare this debate to that of the Clean Needle Program. When a clinic offers clean needles, it doesn’t mean everyone is suddenly going to want to shoot heroin! If you choose to engage in risky behavior, you will be doing it safely whether its condoms or needles.
When it comes to drugs, sex and alcohol, parents need to be involved in their children lives and talk to them about these issues so that family values and attitudes are made clear. To think that you can avoid confronting these issues or hoping your children will do the right thing is living in denial. I find it shocking when parents are completely unaware of these situations.
Regarding the content of these shows: I don’t want to sound like the Parents Council whose negative review of Gossip Girl got added as positive marketing fuel to their print and outdoor campaign ads.
Naturally these shows provide us with a world where we can escape. The programs are not the direct result in causing these behaviors in teens around the nation; They are a mere reflection of the current reality mixed in with the fiction generated for purposes of content.
I hope that young girls don’t try to emulate the behaviors of these idealized characters. Parents need to encourage their kids to be smart and to not succumb to peer pressure. Perhaps next season the “trash” can be replaced with “class” because adding more positive programming to the networks would be a welcome change.